Ununpentium (element symbol: Uup) is a superheavy element that was first synthesised in 2003 by a joint team of Russian and American scientists at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia. With the atomic number 115 in the periodic table the synthetic element is additionally known as element 115, or eka-bismuth. In December 2015, it was recognised as one of four new elements by the Joint Working Party of international scientific bodies IUPAC and IUPAP. In June 2016, the IUPAC suggested the element name moscovium // (element symbol: Mc), a name to be formally accepted by the end of 2016.
Ununpentium is an extremely radioactive element; its most stable known isotope, ununpentium-289, has a half-life of only 220 milliseconds. In the periodic table, it is a p-block transactinide element. It is a member of the 7th period and is placed in group 15 as the heaviest pnictogen, although it hasn't been confirmed to behave as a heavier homologue of the pnictogen bismuth. Ununpentium is calculated to have a few similar properties to its lighter homologues, nitrogen, phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, and bismuth, and be a post-transition metal, although it should additionally show several major differences from them. About 100 atoms of ununpentium have been observed to date, all of which have been shown to have mass numbers from 287 to 290.
The first synthesis of ununpentium succeeded in August 2003 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, by a joint team of Russian and American scientists. Headed by Russian nuclear physicist Yuri Oganessian, the team included American scientists of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The researchers on February 2, 2004, in Physical Review C that they bombarded americium-243 with calcium-48 ions to produce four atoms of ununpentium. These atoms decayed by emission of alpha-particles to ununtrium in approximately 100 milliseconds.
+ 3 1
+ 4 1
The Dubna–Livermore collaboration strengthened their claim for the discoveries of ununpentium and ununtrium by conducting chemical experiments on the final decay product 268Db. None of the nuclides in this decay chain were previously known, so existing experimental data wasn't available to support their claim. In June 2004, and December 2005, the presence of a dubnium isotope was confirmed by extracting the final decay products, measuring spontaneous fission (SF) activities and using chemical identification techniques to confirm that they behave like a group 5 element (as dubnium is known to be in group 5 of the periodic table). Both the half-life and decay mode were confirmed for the proposed 268Db, lending support to the assignment of the parent nucleus to ununpentium. Notwithstanding in 2011, the IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party (JWP) didn't recognise the two elements as having been discovered, because current theory couldn't distinguish the chemical properties of group 4 and group 5 elements with sufficient confidence. Furthermore, the decay properties of all the nuclei in the decay chain of ununpentium hadn't been previously characterised before the Dubna experiments, a situation which the JWP generally considers "troublesome, but not necessarily exclusive".
Road to confirmation
Two heavier isotopes of ununpentium, 289Uup and 290Uup, were discovered in 2009–2010 as daughters of the ununseptium isotopes 293Uus and 294Uus. As of 2016 the JINR additionally has future plans to study lighter isotopes of element 115 by replacing the americium-243 target with the lighter isotope americium-241.
In 2011, the Joint Working Party of international scientific bodies International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) evaluated the 2004 and 2007 Dubna experiments, and concluded that they didn't meet the criteria for discovery. An Additional evaluation of more recent experiments took place within the next few years, and a claim to the discovery of ununpentium was again put forward by Dubna. In August 2013, a team of researchers at Lund University and at the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany announced they had repeated the 2004 experiment, confirming Dubna's findings. Further confirmation was published by the team at Berkeley in 2015.
In December 2015, the IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party recognised the element's discovery and assigned the priority to the Dubna-Berkeley collaboration of 2009–2010, giving them the right to suggest a permanent name for it.
Using Mendeleev's nomenclature for unnamed and undiscovered elements, ununpentium is at times known as eka-bismuth. In 1979 IUPAC recommended that the placeholder systematic element name ununpentium (with the corresponding symbol of Uup) be used until the discovery of the element is confirmed and a name is decided on. Although widely used in the chemical community on all levels, from chemistry classrooms to advanced textbooks, the recommendations are mostly ignored among scientists in the field, who call it "element 115", with the symbol of (115) or even simply 115.
On 30 December 2015, discovery of the element was recognised by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). According to IUPAC recommendations, the discoverer(s) of a new element has the right to suggest a name. A suggested name was langevinium, after Paul Langevin. Later, the Dubna team mentioned the name moscovium several times as one among a large number of possibilities, referring to the Moscow Oblast where Dubna is located.
In June 2016, IUPAC endorsed the latter proposal to be formally accepted by the end of the year.
Nuclear stability and isotopes
Ununpentium is expected to be in the middle of an island of stability centred on copernicium (element 112) and flerovium (element 114): the reasons for the presence of this island, however, are still not well understood. Due to the expected high fission barriers, any nucleus within this island of stability exclusively decays by alpha decay and perhaps a few electron capture and beta decay. Although the known isotopes of ununpentium don't actually have enough neutrons to be on the island of stability, they can be seen to approach the island as in general, the heavier isotopes are the longer-lived ones.
The isotope 291Uup is especially interesting as it has only one neutron more than the heaviest known ununpentium isotope, 290Uup. It could plausibly be synthesised as the daughter of ununseptium-295, which in turn can be made from the reaction 249Bk(48Ca,2n)295Uus. Calculations show that it might have a significant electron capture or positron emission decay mode in addition to alpha decaying and additionally have a relatively long half-life of several seconds. This would produce 291Fl, 291Uut, and finally 291Cn which is expected to be in the middle of the island of stability and have a half-life of about 1200 years, affording the most likely hope of reaching the middle of the island using current technology. Possible drawbacks are that the cross section of the production reaction of 295Uus is expected to be low and the decay properties of superheavy nuclei this close to the line of beta stability are largely unexplored.
Other possibilities to synthesise nuclei on the island of stability include quasifission (partial fusion followed by fission) of a massive nucleus. Such nuclei tend to fission, expelling doubly magic or nearly doubly magic fragments such as calcium-40, tin-132, lead-208, or bismuth-209. Recently it has been shown that the multi-nucleon transfer reactions in collisions of actinide nuclei (such as uranium and curium) might be used to synthesise the neutron-rich superheavy nuclei located at the island of stability, although formation of the lighter elements nobelium or seaborgium is more favored. One last possibility to synthesise isotopes near the island is to use controlled nuclear explosions to create a neutron flux high enough to bypass the gaps of instability at 258–260Fm and at mass number 275 (atomic numbers 104 to 108), mimicking the r-process in which the actinides were first produced in nature and the gap of instability around radon bypassed. Some such isotopes (especially 291Cn and 293Cn) might even have been synthesised in nature, but would have decayed away far too quickly (with half-lives of only thousands of years) and be produced in far too small quantities (about 10−12 the abundance of lead) to be detectable as primordial nuclides today outside cosmic rays.
Physical and atomic
In the periodic table, ununpentium is a member of group 15, the pnictogens, below nitrogen, phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Every previous pnictogen has five electrons in its valence shell, forming a valence electron configuration of ns2np3. In ununpentium's case, the trend should be continued and the valence electron configuration is predicted to be 7s27p3; therefore, ununpentium will behave similarly to its lighter congeners in a large number of respects. Notwithstanding notable differences are likely to arise; a largely contributing effect is the spin–orbit (SO) interaction—the mutual interaction between the electrons' motion and spin. It is especially strong for the superheavy elements, because their electrons move much faster than in lighter atoms, at velocities comparable to the speed of light. In relation to ununpentium atoms, it lowers the 7s and the 7p electron energy levels (stabilizing the corresponding electrons), but two of the 7p electron energy levels are stabilised more than the additional four. The stabilisation of the 7s electrons is called the inert pair effect, and the effect "tearing" the 7p subshell into the more stabilised and the less stabilised parts is called subshell splitting. Computation chemists see the split as a change of the second (azimuthal) quantum number l from 1 to 1⁄2 and 3⁄2 for the more stabilised and less stabilised parts of the 7p subshell, respectively. For a large number of theoretical purposes, the valence electron configuration might be represented to reflect the 7p subshell split as 7s2
3/2. These effects cause ununpentium's chemistry to be somewhat different from that of its lighter congeners.
The valence electrons of ununpentium fall into three subshells: 7s (two electrons), 7p1/2 (two electrons), and 7p3/2 (one electron). The first two of these are relativistically stabilised and hence behave as inert pairs, while the last is relativistically destabilised and can easily participate in chemistry. (The 6d electrons aren't destabilised enough to participate chemically, although this might still be possible in the two previous elements ununtrium and flerovium.) Thus, the +1 oxidation state should be favored, like Tl+, and consistent with this the first ionization potential of ununpentium should be around 5.58 eV, continuing the trend towards lower ionisation potentials down the pnictogens. Ununpentium and ununtrium both have one electron outside a quasi-closed shell configuration that can be delocalized in the metallic state: thus they should have similar melting and boiling points (both melting around 400 °C and boiling around 1100 °C) due to the strength of their metallic bonds being similar. Additionally, the predicted ionisation potential, ionic radius (1.5 Å for Uup+; 1.0 Å for Uup3+), and polarizability of Uup+ are expected to be more similar to Tl+ than its true congener Bi3+. Ununpentium should be a dense metal due to its high atomic weight, with a density around 13.5 g/cm3. The electron of the hydrogen-like ununpentium atom (oxidized so that it only has one electron, Uup114+) is expected to move so fast that it has a mass 1.82 times that of a stationary electron, due to relativistic effects. For comparison, the figures for hydrogen-like bismuth and antimony are expected to be 1.25 and 1.077 respectively.
Ununpentium is predicted to be the third member of the 7p series of chemical elements and the heaviest member of group 15 (VA) in the Periodic Table, below bismuth. In this group, each member is known to portray the group oxidation state of +5 but with differing stability. For nitrogen, the +5 state is mostly a formal explanation of molecules like N2O5: it is quite difficult to have five covalent bonds to nitrogen due to the inability of the small nitrogen atom to accommodate five ligands. The +5 state is well represented for the essentially non-relativistic typical pnictogens phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony. Notwithstanding for bismuth it becomes rare due to the relativistic stabilisation of the 6s orbitals known as the inert pair effect, so that the 6s electrons are reluctant to bond chemically. It is expected that ununpentium will have an inert pair effect for both the 7s and the 7p1/2 electrons, as the binding energy of the lone 7p3/2 electron is noticeably lower than that of the 7p1/2 electrons. Nitrogen(I) and bismuth(I) are known but rare and ununpentium(I) is likely to show a few unique properties, probably behaving more like thallium(I) than bismuth(I). Because of spin-orbit coupling, flerovium might display closed-shell or noble gas-like properties; if this is the case, ununpentium will likely be typically monovalent as a result, after the cation Uup+ will have the same electron configuration as flerovium, perhaps giving ununpentium a few alkali metal character. Notwithstanding the Uup3+ cation would behave like its true lighter homolog Bi3+. The 7s electrons are too stabilised to be able to contribute chemically and hence the +5 state should be impossible and ununpentium might be considered to have only three valence electrons. Ununpentium would be quite a reactive metal, with an oxidation potential of about 1.5 V.
The chemistry of ununpentium in aqueous solution should essentially be that of the Uup+ and Uup3+ ions. The former should be easily hydrolyzed and not be easily complexed with halides, cyanide, and ammonia. Ununpentium(I) hydroxide (UupOH), carbonate (Uup2CO3), oxalate (Uup2C2O4), and fluoride (UupF) should be soluble in water; the sulfide (Uup2S) should be insoluble; and the chloride (UupCl), bromide (UupBr), iodide (UupI), and thiocyanate (UupSCN) should be only slightly soluble, so that adding excess hydrochloric acid wouldn't noticeably affect the solubility of ununpentium(I) chloride. Uup3+ should be about as stable as Tl3+ and hence should additionally be an important part of ununpentium chemistry, although its closest homolog among the elements should be its lighter congener Bi3+. Ununpentium(III) fluoride (UupF3) and thiozonide (UupS3) should be insoluble in water, similar to the corresponding bismuth compounds, while ununpentium(III) chloride (UupCl3), bromide (UupBr3), and iodide (UupI3) should be readily soluble and easily hydrolyzed to form oxyhalides such as UupOCl and UupOBr, again analogous to bismuth. Both ununpentium(I) and ununpentium(III) should be common oxidation states and their relative stability should depend greatly on what they're complexed with and the likelihood of hydrolysis.
Unambiguous determination of the chemical characteristics of ununpentium has yet to have been established. In 2011, experiments were conducted to create ununtrium, flerovium, and ununpentium isotopes in the reactions between calcium-48 projectiles and targets of americium-243 and plutonium-244. Notwithstanding the targets included lead and bismuth impurities and hence a few isotopes of bismuth and polonium were generated in nucleon transfer reactions. This, while an unforeseen complication, could give information that would help in the future chemical investigation of the heavier homologs of bismuth and polonium, which are respectively ununpentium and livermorium. The produced nuclides bismuth-213 and polonium-212m were transported as the hydrides 213BiH3 and 212mPoH2 at 850 °C through a quartz wool philtre unit held with tantalum, showing that these hydrides were surprisingly thermally stable, although their heavier congeners UupH3 and LvH2 would be expected to be less thermally stable from simple extrapolation of periodic trends in the p-block. Further calculations on the stability and electronic structure of BiH3, UupH3, PoH2, and LvH2 are needed before chemical investigations take place. Notwithstanding ununpentium and livermorium are expected to be volatile enough as pure elements for them to be chemically investigated in the near future. The chief barrier to their chemical investigation at present is the lack of known isotopes of these elements which are long-lived enough, with only 289Uup being barely usable with current methods.